Search for: "Meyers v. Meyers" Results 381 - 400 of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From Bohmfalk v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am by Chris Seaton
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm by Tom Smith
The Supreme Court recognized that parents’ rights were constitutionally sacrosanct nearly a century ago, in Meyer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:29 pm
A topic about which I know (and have published) a little bit, in addition to having litigated in the Ninth Circuit.Also interesting, however, is what the trial court -- Judge Meyer down here in San Diego -- does. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs assert that there are credibility issues to be addressed at trial, but these assertions are speculative and unsupported, providing no basis to deny summary judgment (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 52 [2015]; Meyers v Rosen, 69 AD3d at 1098). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Esbeck, The Free Exercise Clause, Its Original Public Meaning, and the Reconsideration of Employment Division of Oregon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
After considering the merits of Applicant's appeal the court opined that the Trustees' decision was supported by credible evidence, and was not arbitrary and capricious, citing Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 11:53 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In the instant CPLR Article 78 action the Supreme Court annulled the determination of the retirement system's Board of Trustees [Board] which, by a tied vote, denied Petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits and remanded the matter to the Board for its further consideration.The Board appealed and the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the lower court's ruling "on the law" and dismissed the proceeding.Citing Meyer v… [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or her interests as a… [read post]