Search for: "Microsoft Corporation v. Does"
Results 381 - 400
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Campaigns, Parties Can Accept Free Service From Microsoft, FEC SaysRoll Call – Stephanie Aiken | Published: 9/10/2018 The FEC ruled Microsoft may offer special cybersecurity assistance to candidates without violating rules against corporate contributions. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:46 am
Ones to Watch for 2010: The AmeriKat will be keeping her eyes and whiskers out for the exciting IP stories of 2010 including updates on the bubbling-under of the malevolent ACTA (here and here), the ping-pong saga of Nokia v Apple (here and here), i4i v Microsoft, and the international copyright consequences Premier League v You Tube (and here). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Maybe there is a name that really does drive sale [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
Traditionally, cases that mentioned full forensic imaging of hard drives began their captions with United States v. or State v. because they were criminal matters. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Several leading companies including IKEA Supply, Microsoft, and Salesforce support the reform, and a number of smaller firms do as well.[5] For the reasons discussed below, more firms – and their legal and other advisers– should follow them. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IMPACT), Phishing damages your reputation and your brand - don't allow it: (IPThinkTank)What does it mean to be Pro-IP? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
Case citation: Perkins v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/hrhDHmkcVh -> AM v Toronto Police Service, A presumption of notice to the media for anonymization applications? [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
The Stop Online Piracy Act creates new remedies, it does not create any new liability. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat), (IPKat)… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
: (Michael Geist),Prentice backtracks on Treaty Policy: (Michael Geist),Microsoft misleads o [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Witness the difficult issues in Hermes v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
First and foremost is the Oracle v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Guest Post by Colleen V. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Large corporations tend to be the ones recording multiple marks, but smaller/medium businesses can use it too.Wong: Yes; likely to see other countries’ submissions go up b/c of increasing awareness of these kinds of protections. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
