Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 5:10 am by Bill
Richard Posner weighs in on Miller v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
Well, to this point, they haven't recognized a reporter's privilege, and that did not change with the recent opinion of the United States Navy-Marine Corps of Criminal Appeals in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Changes to the makeup of the United States Supreme Court fuel the continued anticipation of a Roe v Wade reversal. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
MILLER, 67 M.J. 385 (C.A.A.F. 2009), BUT SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 3:12 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Gore, in which the United States Supreme Court decided the fate of the presidency after a razor-thin vote difference between George W.... [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Viking
For an example of a case in which the government forfeited its right to object to the defendant’s admission of hearsay from a declarant whom the government rendered unavailable, consider the recent opinion of the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:49 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On December 14, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Administrator
Feldman argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance with Howard M. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:59 am by jcarnicella
§ 292, was unconstitutional under the Take Care Clause in Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]