Search for: "Miller v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am by azatty
MICKEY MILLER, et al. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the counterclaim sought in Count V relief from TLC on a respondeat superior basis for its officers’ misconduct. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the counterclaim sought in Count V relief from TLC on a respondeat superior basis for its officers’ misconduct. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Coffing Hoist Division, 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987) – an exclusion later extended to compliance with mandatory government standards by the Superior Court (an appellate court in Pennsylvania) – and of a plaintiff’s comparative fault in Kimco Development Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
Google (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Amazon – Smarties v Smarties: Ce De Candy sues Amazon for selling Nestles Smarties: Ce De Candy, Inc v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830 cited in those decisions, this is the first published California case holding that CEQA’s 10-day service provision operates as a statute of limitations, which competes with and trumps the 90-day service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  The Court issued a stay in that case, Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
 The panel discussed Toth v Toth, 2024 PA Super. 192 (Aug. 27, 2024) where the Superior Court of Pennsylvania held that the trial court properly dissolved a family-owned LLC where the members were gripped by deadlock concerning core operations of the company: “As set forth above, the trial court clearly explained the facts of this matter, the deadlock between the parties, the injury and harm to [the LLC], and that it was not practicable for the… [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
As a value in justice work,  it works  with my mother as well as on the street and it even succeeds in the courts, evoking nods of judicial approval, as in the US Constitutional standard which celebrates “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” ,  Trop v Dulles (356 U.S. 86, 1958 ). [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
A lawyer for Warren Kinsella argued Friday in Ontario Superior Court the suit from People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier is a strategic action intended to silence expression in the public interest. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]