Search for: "Minick Law P.C." Results 381 - 398 of 398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 12:51 pm by Gint Krulikas
The post How to Get a Limited Driving Privilege in NC after a DWI in SC appeared first on Minick Law, P.C.. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 8:59 am by Robert Gilligan
  Our Family Law and Divorce lawyers here at Minick Law, P.C. answer questions like these every day. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am by Minick Law
” Notes and Quotes: In assessing whether a seizure constituted a de facto arrest, reviewing courts should determine whether law enforcement officers “dilige [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:11 pm by Minick Law
Begin any argument attacking the validity of a traffic stop with the highest law in the land: The Constitution. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:17 am by Minick Law
Contact us at Minick Law, P.C. for a free consultation on your case. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:37 am by James K Minick
Asheville Office107 Merrimon Ave #110 Asheville, NC 28801 United States (US)Phone: (828) 333-5024Fax: (828) 212-4300Email: minicklaw@gmail.com The post How To Recover Money After A Car Accident | 6 Steps appeared first on Minick Law, P.C.. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:24 pm by Minick Law
Of the three standardized field sobriety tests, two are considered divided attention tests: The Walk-and-Turn and One-Leg Stand. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am by Minick Law
But because the law prohibits imposing criminal liability based on conjecture, gaps in the evidence and controlling precedent require that we reverse defendant’s conviction for driving while impaired. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:15 am by Minick Law
Contact us at Minick Law, P.C. for a free consultation on your case. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm by Minick Law
Supreme Court has recently ruled that a law [20-16.2(b)] allowing the police to search the blood of an unconscious person suspected of DWI based on implied consent and without a warrant to be unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Americo reiterated this argument in the district court, stating that “the Award must be vacated under FAA § 5 and applicable law, because the Award was not made by arbitrators who were appointed under the method provided in the Agreement. [read post]