Search for: "Minor v. United States of America" Results 381 - 400 of 1,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 11:23 am by Andis Kaulins
But they voted for dilution of rights anyway, primarily to the detriment of the women of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm by Randy Barnett
United States, which these same law professors bitterly derided as “conservative judicial activism” when they were decided. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Meanwhile, Russia’s anger has also been roused by the United States’s activation of a missile defense site in Romania. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
ObamaDocket: 10-775Issue(s): Whether a judicial officer of the United States, having jurisdiction of the habeas corpus petition of an alien transported by the executive to, and held at, an offshore prison, has any judicial power to direct the prisoner's release.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (D.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The child was citizen of the United States of America and of the Republic of Argentina. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Chiara Galli, Precarious Protections:  Unaccompanied Minors Seeking Asylum in the United States (2023). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
Once in the United States, the . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the holding in Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
It is a dangerous proposition to arm the minorities to fight back. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Plaintiffs claimed that, had Telmex honored their right to negotiate an exchange of their Conecel units for America Movil shares, plaintiffs would have owned America Movil shares worth more than $1 billion as of May 30, 2008 (the date of the complaint). [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The freedom of association protects an organization's right to refuse to allow someone to speak on its behalf, as the Court held in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]