Search for: "Minus v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 1:44 pm
“The conduct on which the claim is premised must be the type of conduct that would traditionally give rise to liability under state law − and that would give rise to liability under state law even if the FDCA had never been enacted. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:30 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Our poston Yates v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:32 am
” Brief of United States, United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
On the public pension fund side, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the Florida State Board of Administration each support proxy access proposals. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
For many years I used to state in my author's profile (the one in the right column) that, in order to avoid conflicts of interest, I didn't hold or initiate transactions involving technology stocks. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Fast forward two decades − past WLF, Pearson, Western States, Sorrell (2011 +5), and Caronia (2012 +7) − and things sure have changed. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Just about every place else – Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, West Virginia − where state attorney generals (or more likely no-bid, contingent fee lawyers purporting to exercise state power on their behalf) have sought (and sometimes obtained) huge verdicts through endless multiplication of statutory penalties, state appellate courts have stepped in to restore sanity. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am
The Court takes the bench, minus Justice Elena Kagan, who is sitting out the case again. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
” Gertz v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
The case is styled, RSUI Indemnity Company v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:43 am
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997), and Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The first of these cases is Mink v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:53 pm
Makaeff v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 5:06 am
We’ve read a fascinating new case out of Texas, Verticor, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Some of us are veterans of the Bendectin wars, in which scientifically bogus − Daubert v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:41 pm
Siarkowski v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
