Search for: "Monsanto Co."
Results 381 - 400
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly and Co., pp. 12, 26. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
District Judge Jeffrey White denied granting a ban on producing genetically modified sugar beets, for at least one year, that was sought by environmental organizations, organic producers, as well as food safety groups.As Jeffrey Tomich reports in today's (3-17-10) St.Louis Post-Dispatch, the judge believed that granting the injunction against planting and processing Monsanto Co.'s genetically modified sugar beets this spring would cause '"dramatic and… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
Holder, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
(FDA Law Blog) US: Review and correction of patent term adjustment calculation made by the USPTO: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
(FDA Law Blog) US: Review and correction of patent term adjustment calculation made by the USPTO: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm
Reliance Standard Life Insurance and Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
Monsanto Co., 243 F.3d 1316, 1325-26 (Fed. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Click Here Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs Colorado Bumper Exchange Site, Pueblo, Pueblo County, CO. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’: Wyeth et al v Abbott… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’: Wyeth et al v Abbott… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:55 am
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. (09-448) – petitioner’s brief Monsanto Company v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:47 pm
Canada (Commissioner of Patents); Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:48 am
Monsanto Co., 948 F.2d 1264, 1269 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Aurobindo Pharma Limited (Patentcircle) India/US: Indian pharma sector ‘fares well’ in US disputes (PatLit) India: The woes of the grassroot innovator in the agricultural sector (Spicy IP) South Africa: Biopiracy in Alice – Schwabe Pharamaceuticals wishes to patent method for extracting active ingredient in cough medicine from pelargonium roots (Afro-IP) UK: Okay to split costs where actions are joined, says Court of Appeal: Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Co Ltd (PatLit)… [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
Magellan Pipeline Co. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:00 am
(Patent Docs) Roundup Ready Soybean: Infringement of US patent: Monsanto Co. et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:05 pm
Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986, which held:If an individual discloses his trade secret to others who are under no obligation to protect the confidentiality of the information, or otherwise publicly discloses the secret, his property right is extinguished.In the Southwest Stainless case, because the employer had “disclosed the quote” and the customer was “under no obligation to keep the information confidential,” the Court held the trial court erred in holding… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 9:05 am
Monsanto Co. is getting a lot of attention from federal courts these days, and the news is following the agricultural giant’s courtroom fights.First, Reuters is reporting that despite the US government’s opposition, the United States Supreme Court said on Friday, January 15, 2010 that the High Court will hear Monsanto’s appeal of an earlier ruling that prevented the company from selling genetically modified alfalfa seed until an environmental review is… [read post]
