Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court" Results 381 - 400 of 2,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
The anti-commandeering doctrine originated in the 1842 Supreme Court case Prigg v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm by Elizabeth Reese
Second, Montana was not the United States’ preferred test, and thus route to victory. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:23 am by Brittany Williams
This post summarizes decisions released by the United States Supreme Court on June 1, 2021 and June 3, 2021. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Montana, the Supreme Court ruled that if states subsidize private education, they cannot withhold funding from students who choose to attend religious schools. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
United States, however, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court and held that a tribe has “inherent sovereign authority” over any activity on a reservation that impacts the welfare of the tribe. [read post]
” Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the unanimous court, reviewed Montana v United States and identified two exemptions to the general rule that the “inherent sovereign powers of an [Indigenous] tribe do not extend to the activities of nonmembers” [Oliphant v Suquamish Tribe, 1978]. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:15 am by Elizabeth Reese
ShareIn its first major opinion on the scope of American Indian tribes’ sovereign powers in decades, the Supreme court held on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 5:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher is Foundation Professor of Law at Michigan State University College of Law and Director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
States were never intended to tax international income, and doing so raises serious constitutional issues in many states. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Comparing Congress’ Federalization of Tribal Court Criminal Procedure with the Supreme Court’s Regulation of State Courts Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 109, No. 299, 2020Number of pages: 60 Posted: 29 Mar 2021Accepted Paper SeriesJordan GrossAlexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana Jurisprudence and Recommendations for Tribal Court Authority Due to Imposition of U.S. [read post]
19 May 2021, 6:22 pm by Howard Bashman
Montana AG accuses Supreme Court of impropriety, threatening and maligning his staff”: Darrell Ehrlick of the Daily Montanan has this report on a letter that the Attorney General of Montana sent today to that state’s highest court. [read post]
19 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Unknown
Department of the Interior (Education) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlStand Up For California! [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:57 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th holds that a proceeding in the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court is akin to collateral review. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Turnpike Commission, Layoffs and Other Big Business Largely Decided Behind Closed Doors” by Jonathan Silver (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) for MSN Tennessee: “Tennessee to Rebid $123M Contract Amid Rigging Accusations” by Travis Loller for Associated Press News Legislative Issues Montana: “MT Supreme Court Rejects AG Request to Disqualify Itself in Email Case” by Mike Dennison for KTVH The post Tuesday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared… [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The holding is important–repeated and specific threats of litigation by an out-of-state patentee can be sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction for a declaratory judgment action.[2]  The decision relies upon the an expanded notion of purposeful availment from the Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Ford,[3] but should also be seen as further limiting the holding of Red Wing Shoe.[4] In the U.S., personal jurisdiction is handled on a… [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:58 am by Howard Bashman
” You can access Wednesday’s unanimous ruling of the Supreme Court of Montana at this link. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:44 am by Eugene Volokh
As the [New Jersey Supreme Court explained in the earlier Munafo case], all that is required is for the defendant "to cause bodily injury [and] flee the scene [with] knowledge or a reasonable belief that the injured person was in a vulnerable state. [read post]