Search for: "Mr. T v. Ms. T" Results 381 - 400 of 1,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr Bates (for Ms K) further submitted that, as there is no provision for re-entry or forfeiture in the tenancy agreement, it does not fall within section 82(3) and a section 146 notice has not been served. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
” (Q554)“It is for the regulator to set out codes of practice, but they won’t be around individual harms; they will be around systems and processes—what we expect the companies to do. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
…  It may be that Ms Wilson is correct to assert that the reality of the reporting may be less high minded than that contemplated in argument by Mr Farmer and Ms Tickle. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am by INFORRM
The second case – A Local Authority Criticised Yet Anonymised A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors is a case heard by Mr Justice Hayden, sitting in the High Court. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
This is not the same as the Canadian legislation. 1226: Mr Hoskins QC says Canadian legislation referred to in the Microsoft case does not contain the specific ‘suitability’ requirement that we have in the UK legislation. 1224: Mr Hoskins QC commences submissions in reply. 1223: Ms Demetriou QC concludes her submissions on Ground 2. 1222: Ms Demetriou QC says the the rules provide a means for members of a class to put forward their own proposals for… [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
The Ratcliffes were the landlords, Ms Patterson was the tenant and Mr Porter a guarantor, who played no part in proceedings. [read post]