Search for: "Neil Barrett"
Results 381 - 400
of 609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
Sotomayor and Barrett asked whether Tekoh had proper [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Taken in historical order, they were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
But when writing “for the ages,” as Justice Neil Gorsuch foreshadowed in oral argument, perhaps judicial restraint does not come easily. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm
” By a vote of 6-3 (with Jackson joining the majority and Barrett dissenting), the court sent the case back to the lower courts for another look. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch each asked about alternate ways to interpret the statute beyond the two options presented by the parties. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett characterized one formulation of the major-questions doctrine as resting [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 1:09 pm
During these announcements, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, seated closest to the press section, made direct eye contact with me. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:37 pm
Both Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett suggested collapsing the test into a single inquiry deriving from South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:48 pm
Justice Neil Gorusch – after a lengthy back-and-forth about a challenge to a court martial, which dissolves after it reaches a decision – noted that in the context of ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, courts frequently say “counsel was effective even if he lost. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett suggested that even if the court were to reject the government’s broad interpretation, Section 1512(c)(2) might still apply to Fisher. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
Concurring in the decision to set aside the lower court rulings but agreeing with none of the majority’s reasoning were Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also voiced skepticism that the conscience exemptions would not provide enough protection for health-care providers opposed to abortion. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm
Justice Neil Gorsuch later offered Yang a counter example, strongly suggesting that “a bench memorandum” simply could not be conveyed via its component parts. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett focused on suggestions that heightened scrutiny is appropriate because SB1 discriminates based on transgender status. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett was among the justices who raised this point. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:58 am
With regard to the constitutional violation, Roberts (joined by Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett) noted that the starting point for each party’s analysis was Edmond v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
At first we suspected that, due to its limited knowledge of current events, the bot might not know about Barrett. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm
What is more disheartening is that the court’s newest originalists, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, signed on to this historical charade. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
” Justice Neil Gorsuch provides a (typically) concise summary of the unanimous opinion in Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, all eyes and ears were on Chief Justice John Roberts and the three Justices appointed by Donald Trump—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—because of the widespread belief that how they vote will determine whether abortion will continue to be a constitutional right. [read post]
