Search for: "North Dakota v. Long"
Results 381 - 400
of 423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
North Dakota – N.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
North Dakota – N.D. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
That's one.The South Dakota Supreme Court has also followed Twombly/Iqbal. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
BTW, three states have never ratified the amendment, North Dakota, Georgia and South Carolina, but that is of no constitutional consequence. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:00 pm
Well folks you can just feel the long holiday weekend coming on, as even our beloved judicial beasts of burden, who -- admit it -- toil and sweat in the Fortified Concrete Bunker of Justice basically for your own personal amusement, are starting to wind down and plan their departures to North Carolina or North Dakota or North Korea or wherever Florida appellate judges go to escape the unbearably massive pressure of releasing a couple of opinions once a… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:18 pm
If, for example, your employees work in California or North Dakota, your non-competition agreements will be unenforceable, except in extremely limited circumstances. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The decision purports to affirm the long-followed Second Circuit decision in Gartenberg v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
As a result of the 1975 amendments, all of Texas, Alaska and now Arizona came under the law, as did several counties in California, Colorado, Florida, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota and two townships in Michigan. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:48 pm
I picture the enraged North Dakota ex-husband climbing into his pickup, determined to kill the new boyfriend, but after half an hour he has to stop and buy gas. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
That's straightforward enough, and as long as product liability cases were brought under the "reasonable man" standard of negligence, there wasn't any significant dispute over this requirement. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
Gilbert, 730 N.W.2d 833, issued by the Supreme Court of North Dakota in 2007. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
[see comment for pending legislation warning]ColoradoIn the Centennial State, it's okay to have informal interviews with physicians, and courts can grant orders authorizing them, as long as the plaintiff is given "reasonable notice" of proposed interviews, and the interviews are limited to medical matters waived by the plaintiff in the litigation. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
The regions with the most lost enforcement actions are EPA Region 6, which includes the states of New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana, where 138 enforcement cases were dropped, and EPA Region 8, which includes the states of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado, where 106 enforcement cases have been dropped. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
North Dakota, 05-564, denied Jan. 22, 2007). [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
Only Wyoming, Vermont, and North Dakota are smaller. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
April 28, 1987).North Carolina: Baraukas v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
North Dakota reaffirmed that a corporation must have a "substantial nexus" with a state in order to be subject to its sales and use taxes. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
North Dakota reaffirmed that a corporation must have a "substantial nexus" with a state in order to be subject to its sales and use taxes. [read post]
