Search for: "North Dakota v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
District Court for the District of North Dakota, in State of Ohio, et al., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001); United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Before today, the prior regulatory definition of waters of the United States was in effect in 13 states where the federal district court for North Dakota had enjoyed the new Clean Water Rule; the new Rule’s definition applied in the rest of the country. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
China then began rejecting all corn from the United States containing the MIR 162 trait, which persisted for over a year. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
See, North Dakota v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 11:05 am
The case is State of North Dakota, et al., v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
North Dakota v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
Yesterday, a federal district court in North Dakota granted a preliminary injunction blocking implementation of a new Environmental Protection Agency rule defining “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at a recent decision by the Eighth Circuit holding that a North Dakota law which prohibited abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected is unconstitutional, noting that it “closed with a five-page lament: North Dakota’s law may be inconsistent with Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood, but the Supreme Court should ‘re-evaluate its jurisprudence. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In fact, North Dakota does not require its voters to register and nothing prevents other states from following suit. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
This opposition—rooted in concerns over states’ rights and the Constitution—will take center stage in coming months in four lawsuits originating in Texas, Georgia, Ohio, and North Dakota. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
North Dakota: removed restrictions on carry in public parks, stores that sell liquor, and public highway rest areas. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
Ohio); North Dakota, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, South Dakota, Wyoming, the New Mexico Environmental Department and New Mexico State Engineer in States of North [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
North Dakota, 14-973, a summertime sequel. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Kite, The History of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Indiana Historical Society Press, 2007); Mark Edward Lender, "This Honorable Court": The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 1789-2000 (Rutgers University Press, 2006); John O. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
North Dakota 14-973Issue: Whether or under what circumstances police officers conduct a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when they trespass in common areas of locked apartment buildings to look for evidence of criminal activity. [read post]
