Search for: "North v. North" Results 381 - 400 of 18,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:20 am by Phil Dixon
North Carolina generally permits substitute analyst testimony (see State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
By this time the case was called Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
‎ [6] The United States and each of the following 34 states as amicus curiae in support of Oklahoma: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. [7] Rutledge… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
If a state can simply "refuse to confirm or deny" whether a ship is from that country, and thereby grant jurisdiction to every other nation, how is that at all consistent with fundamental fairness, and how are the occupants of that ship supposed to know that they're suddenly subject to the jurisdiction of whatever nation -- say, Iran, or North Korea -- feels like prosecuting them? [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
Julie Tsirkin, Monica Alba, Frank Thorp V and Rebecca Kaplan report for NBC News. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Damon Duncan
For North Carolina, consult the North Carolina General Statutes. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Consistent with that principle, courts in recent years have invalidated broad election-lie statutes in North Carolina, Ohio, Minnesota, and Massachusetts, holding that they are insufficiently clear and narrow to survive First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]