Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 381 - 400
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2007, 4:17 am
The gist of the article is that: MPs are considering changes to data protection laws that would make chief executives directly responsible for keeping the public's personal information safe and make the improper use of data a criminal offence.With the smell of Sarbanes-Oxley in the air, this is something to keep an eye on if you're in the UK. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 8:26 am
"You're getting a lot more focus on compliance and on ethics internally in corporate structures," Meyer told The American Lawyer. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:26 pm
It seems that everyone in Silicon Valley hates Sarbanes-Oxley â€â [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
I'm not going to re-post his post, but he says, "I think about these issues a lot because the most extreme sentence almost always involve some kind of trial penalty . . . . [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
"We're at the point of overkill," she notes, adding that regulation has changed the message her companies hear from investment banks. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 3:24 pm
Sure, it’s easy to blame rising audit fees on Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:02 am
"I think we're well aware of what we spend. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 11:03 am
Plaintiffs contended that it was “black-letter law” that defendants were obliged to re-produce its entire document production in electronic form. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
And with that, he went on to discuss the fifth anniversary of Sarbanes-Oxley, passed in response to corporate and accounting scandals, and the excerpts from his book on the subject he made available. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 10:44 am
Frans Von Der Dunk of the International Institute of Air and Space Law at Leiden University.And if you're looking for SOX materials -- rulemaking, reports, studies, proposals, FAQ's, more (hey, we're going to need 'em), SEC has a warehouse full. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
In evaluating the time period for plaintiffs bringing an action under §14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, the court In re Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
In re InfoSonics Corp., 2007 U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 12:58 am
Her mission was to centralize decision making, record keeping and, above all, compliance with the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 7:30 am
One of the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley rules for publicly traded companies is that they demonstrate that they are promoting an "ethical culture" in the workplace. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 6:50 am
So, OK, now you're thinking: "What? [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:56 am
Today's Wall Street Journal notes: Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 10:29 am
In re Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
A new study tells if they're right. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:20 am
The focus on the way things are now, rather than they way they're going to be. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:19 am
Notice also that during the period, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was effective. [read post]
