Search for: "PATTERSON v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449, 455-458 (1958), neither may it do so by invoking nonexistent rules of state substantive law. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, California appellate courts apply intervening state supreme court rules retroactively when reviewing cases, even if the judgment in the trial court was entered prior to the supreme court ruling (Vazquez v. [read post]
Another state Attorney General joins in the Resort Fee litigation – this time suing Hilton On July 23, 2019, Attorney General Doug Patterson filed a lawsuit against Hilton, alleging that it has engaged in deceptive and misleading pricing practices and failure to disclose fees in violation of Nebraska’s consumer protection laws. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:23 am
In Patterson v Turner, 88 AD3d 617, the court ruled that material on Facebook, if relevant, was subject to discovery while in Abrams v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am by Eric Goldman
TripAdvisor * Social Media Rant Against Airline Employee Wasn’t Defamatory But May Be False Light–Patterson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
Summary of Decision issued April 21, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Williams v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:40 am
The defendants were represented by State Farm's in-house counsel (Cliff Patterson, from H. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:40 am
The defendants were represented by State Farm's in-house counsel (Cliff Patterson, from H. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court's 1984 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Rumpole
State, 23 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), and Bonilla v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]