Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER" Results 381 - 400 of 481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for Wyoming will be a senior assistant state attorney general, Peter Kenneth Michael, of Cheyenne. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, I remained an avid Os fan until about 2000, when I finally was no longer able to stomach what Peter Angelos was doing to the team. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Track ISPs and Takedown Notices Peter Yu, Drake University Law School The Graduated Response Copyright holders think that infringement makes ISPs more money by enhancing demand; so they should share the responsibility. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Peter Kaplan: editor of New York Observer, well-known in NY media circles. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Lawrence Lessig ‘on the economics’: curse of the copyright holders (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright Decisions District Court Massachusetts: Not much hope left – copyright claim time-barred, claim for unjust enrichment pre-empted: Jürek Zamoyski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm by Guest Blogger
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]