Search for: "PETERS v. PETERS" Results 381 - 400 of 8,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
Peter Owen, Thinking Anglicans: July General Synod – electronic voting results. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
Clearly Peter is not far from poor, since the temporary support that was ordered was over $8000 a month. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
The idea here is as old as those expressed by Henry Ford in the Famous 1919 US case Dodge v Ford: happy, well used and paid workers make great consumers and reduce labor issues even when they can act in concert. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
In previous versions of the Monitor(Dussel Peters 2021) it was highlighted based on sources such as the Economic Commissionfor Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) that LAC should invest around 5% of GDP—and up to 6.2% according to the same source—in infrastructure, although it was barely 2%for the most recent period 2015-2019 (Dussel Peters 2021). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
Craig Wright, despite finding that Peter McCormack had caused serious damage to his reputation, Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]