Search for: "Parallel Productions, Inc."
Results 381 - 400
of 1,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
Leo Feist, Inc. 234 F. 105 (S.D.N.Y. 1916) where Judge Learned Hand had to compare two works to determine if there had been copying. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm
., Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
., Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2015 WL 728031, No. 12–17502 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Ciba Vision Corporation Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
” In fact, Colorado parallels many national trends, particularly regarding first time buyers. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* "Fool's errand": no need to create your own brand if you can use someone else's Jeremy notes Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2015] EWCA Civ 54 [on which see earlier katpost here], a trade mark infringement decision of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, on parallel importation and over-stickering of pharmaceutical products. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
AstraZeneca markets and sells pharmaceutical products in the United States, including a drug sold under the trade name Nexium. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Medtronic, Inc., 961 F. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 11:19 am
The NECC opinion we are looking at today, In re New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
Hyland’s, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
’” DePuy Spine, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
And only a few days later (October 4th), King filed a lawsuit against 20th Century Fox Record Corporation and Mister Maestro, Inc. for selling records of the speech without King’s consent.1 The District Court granted a preliminary injunction in December after concluding, “There are thus no principles which prevent relief to plaintiff from what seems the unfair and unjust use by defendants of his speech and his voice. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
Office Depot is currently under investigations for parallel activity by the attorneys general of Texas, Arizona, and Missouri. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
In both cases defendants are being sued for not warning about foreseeable risks of products that they didn’t make and didn't sell.We first recognized the parallelism back in early 2012, when the California Supreme Court decided O’Neil v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:29 am
American Medical Systems, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
Levine is not a parallel claim case. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
Creech, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc., 850 N.W.2d 353 (Iowa 2014). [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the previous blog, I noted that the logical next step in understanding “privacy as fairness” was to examine if it is possible to identify principles that would effectively guide policy and regulation aimed at such fairness. [read post]
