Search for: "Park v. Respondent"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
I ¶8 In the early hours of a March morning in 2016, Officer Matthew Overman responded to a report that ―the driver of [a] truck had fallen asleep and hit‖ a light pole in a McDonald‘s parking lot in Salt Lake City. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
I ordinarily wouldn’t count this case as a relist because after its first conference, the court called on those respondents who hadn’t yet filed a responsive pleading to do so (only one of three respondents had done so already). [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
I have been writing about the fundamental shift in the focus of human rights and human rights discourse, from one framed in the discursive tropes of liberal democratic ideology to one framed in an emerging Marxist-Leninist discourse (Backer, Larry Catá, ‘By Dred Things I am Compelled’: China and the Challenge to International Human Rights Law and Policy (January 15, 2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
But in R.A.V. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
People started running out of the house toward the parked car. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Nakashima v MTCC 818 Being short-staffed after the office administrator’s departure does not justify delay in responding to an owner, which delay constituted a records request refusal. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:28 am
FAR 33.103(d)(2)(v)-(vi). [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 7:19 am
Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Lange v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
Canada In the case of Sole Cleaning Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29737-20 Imperial College London v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27808-20 Ross v Bishop’s Stortford Independent, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation Judgments The judgment of Jay J in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v Gedi Gruppo Editoriale SPA & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) is now available on Bailii. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
Contracts/Condos: “Air Space Parcels”; Parking; Pre & Post‑Incorporation ContractsOwners, Strata Plan LMS 3905 v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:19 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Piggie Park Enterprises (1968) are relevant to present-day controversies over claims to religious exemptions to antidiscrimination laws and cautioned against arguments—advanced earlier in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
