Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 381 - 400
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
After the recent E. coli O157:H7 outbreak linked to Bravo raw milk gouda cheese that sickened 38 (one with HUS), the New York Times is quickly becoming the go to newspaper for cheese lovers.Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese - "Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules" - after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the "60 day rule" - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks,… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:22 am
If you tell me that actually it has turned out that they lowered the ranges because of X, Y or Z, then perhaps some additional relief will be warranted. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Y is for Yes - Many want the negotiators to say "yes" in order to get the benefits they desire assoon aspossible. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
X. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
For example, the ACS advises their members to: • take part in ongoing food safety education • follow a HACCP plan • regularly conduct their own product and environment testing • maintain accurate and up-to-date records • seek third party certification • build relationships with local regulators Conclusions Artisanal raw milk cheeses are distributed around the world and revered by fans for their unique sensory characteristics, as well as the art and… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:33 am
The chip uses two registers (an X register and a Y register) with two decoders (an X decoder and a Y decoder) to figure out what goes where there is a "Y-select circuit. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
[X] was not a party to those proceedings. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
WalMart (now called WalMart v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
If the third party publishes the information he is potentially guilty of a criminal contempt for undermining the purpose of the interim injunction (see for example X and Y v Persons Unknown [2006] EWHC 2783 (QB)). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
We accept that it's okay for NY to apply different tax rates to X and Y if X earns $100,000 in 2010 while Y earns $100,000 in 2011 because NY can change its tax rates, even though it's not okay for NY to tax X and Y at different rates if they both earn $100,000 in 2010, even though they live in different towns. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
As Eady J said in X & Y v Persons Unknown[2006] EWHC 2783 (QB), [2007] EMLR 290 at para 72: “…the Spycatcher doctrine [Attorney-General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1988] Ch 333 at 375, 380] would go on inhibiting third parties from publishing the relevant information notionally pending a trial which would never actually take place. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
The question had been considered in a number of cases including X and Y v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:19 am
Coventry City Council v X, Y and Z (Care Proceedings: Costs: Identification of Local Authority) [2010] EWHC B22 (Fam) – Read judgment Coventry City Council has been ordered to pay £100,000 in costs and has been severely criticised by the High Court for child protection failures. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Mechanisms exist for “circumventing strict application of consent” by the party states. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:38 pm
In other words, if there is an integration clause in a contract that says “X”, even if one party may have orally maintained “Y” throughout the dealings with the other party, the other party will likely be cut off from using the oral representation of “Y” against the other party, because the contract states “X”. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm
Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2010 U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:50 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Truckstops of America v. [read post]
