Search for: "Patterson v. Does" Results 381 - 400 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 11:12 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79 (1986); Patterson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Patterson, 218 P.3d 1031, 1037 (Ariz. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file constitutes a lawful… [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Data Protection The Field Fisher Privacy and Information Law Blog has two posts:  “What does EU regulatory guidance on the Internet of Things mean in practice? [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:54 am by John Day
Bell, 127 Tenn. 142, 153 S.W. 844 (1912); and Cummings v. 802 Patterson, 59 Tenn. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
 On somewhat different topic, I saw this Legal Newsline story by John O'Brien, about Dickie Scruggs receiving a trial subpoena for the McIntosh v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Nye (Stagnaro, Saba & Patterson), the UCLA First Amendment Clinic had filed an amicus brief supporting that position and arguing that the court should hear the case, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am by Matthew Scarola
He emphasized that the Court “neither purports to alter nor does alter [its] holding in Panetti v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Patterson’s alleged involvement in the conduct at issue in the Indictment.See Wheat, 486 U.S. at 159; see also Powell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:26 am
  [Mitsubishi] may instead seek to recuperate its losses through civil remedies.Account in Wife's Name Does Not Escape ForfeitureIn a comprehensive decision that may foretell the Madoffs' forfeiture fate, United States v. [read post]