Search for: "Paul, in Re" Results 381 - 400 of 10,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2007, 1:52 am
Relevant to the first Office Action in the re-examination of the WARF patents, californiastemcellreport has text:"'It's a big thing,' said Paul Lesko, patent attorney with SimmonsCooper in East Alton, Ill. 'Most times there will be at least an amendment, if the patent survives,' although the process could take years. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:51 am by Rick Garnett
  Next -- and proving true, I guess, Paul's predictions about disagreements-among-friends -- I think it would be a good thing if the possibility Eugene Volokh raises - i.e., that the Court might re-examine the so-called "endorsement test" -- came to pass. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
You're doing yourself no favors, Matt, and insulting my intelligence — "she’s apparently incapable of reading between the lines" — is — as they say — incivil. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
(Just because you’re a “criminal” doesn’t mean you are not also an “enemy combatant. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:24 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
He lost me here, but you've got to give Sloan credit for writing what would be a strong entry in a competition requiring an essay titled "Justice John Paul Stevens is the greatest Justice in Supreme Court history. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Paul Ferrillo In a recent guest post, industry veterans John McCarrick and Paul Schiavone outlined some policy terms and conditions they suggested D&O insurers may want to address as the insurers try to re-orient toward profitability. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:38 am by steven perkins
re/research/rth/index.aspx In September 2010, PLoS Medicine published the following Debate on drug companies and their human rights obligations. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am by Andrew Hamm
The post Justice Kagan and Paul Clement share SG stories at American Law Institute annual meeting appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:06 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Rather like teenagers who hate that they actually need their stupid, out-of-touch parents, and must constantly howl about it to their friends, who join in because they realize they’re supposed to hate their parents, too. . . . [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:36 am by brian
[By Paul Krugman] Watching our system deal with the debt ceiling crisis — a wholly self-inflicted crisis, which may nonetheless have disastrous consequences — it’s increasingly obvious that what we’re looking at is the destructive influence of a cult that has really poisoned our political system. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:48 pm
We're reaching out for comment to the associate in question and to Paul Hastings. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:23 am by Ezra Rosser
I just finished (re)reading Paul Krugman, How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:05 am
Thanks, Paul -- Paul Birch pbirch@richmond.edu Computer Services Librarian University of Richmond School of Law [read post]
6 May 2012, 7:37 am by Mark Summerfield
In re: application by Paul Andrew Cronk [2012] APO 28 (21 March 2012) Inventive step – assessment on ‘balance of probabilities’ – relevant law applying to application filed on 26 February 2003 A patent hearing officer has upheld an examiner’s finding that claims directed to a ‘mushroom stud and keyhole’ arrangement for assembling a lighting unit (‘luminaire’) are obvious and lacking inventive step, despite provision by the… [read post]