Search for: "People v Davis"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
(People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:48 am
Davis, 598 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2010) (same); United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Washington, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
"The case is not, strictly, a family case as it involves a property that was purchased by two people who were simply friends - a scenario that is surely becoming more common, as property prices increase. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
In Ayestas v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
Unfortunately I still saw some rather recent articles about Apple v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:18 am
The Supreme Court has held that observing and photographing people’s homes and surrounding areas from an airplane, flying at 1,000 feet, doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment (see California v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm
-Beaumont 2014, pet. denied) (intentional infliction of emotional distress); and, Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 12:52 pm
Here’s a simple truth: Because a claimant (injured worker) proceeding “without the aid of competent counsel” is as “helpless as a turtle on its back,” Davis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:55 am
People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
” Lady Justice Nicola Davies agreed and permission was granted to the claimants to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
