Search for: "People v Fully"
Results 381 - 400
of 5,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am
For example, the Court in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
In my opinion, and here's the shiny object in the weeds that I wanted to get to, the People have a burden under People v Huntley (15 NY2d 72 [1965]) to establish that the statement is voluntary before it can be admitted:"the jury passes on voluntariness only after the judge has fully and independently resolved the issue against the accused’ and has made express findings upon the disputed fact question of voluntariness. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:47 pm
From People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 4:24 pm
In a very disturbing decision by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in Watson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:04 am
Most people believe that that in order to be enforceable a contract must be in writing. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
See People v Frazier, 478 Mich 231, 243; 733 NW2d 713 (2007). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
The NHS functions because the tax payers and the Government pay for it - the people, the equipment, the drugs all cost money. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
The basic problem, as Jack fully realizes, is how one constructs a stable--and admirable--polity for what Holmes called people of "fundamentally different views," where some of the central differences involve precisely what might count as "the public interest" or "pubic good. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
The case before the Court is Doe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Crookes v Newton 2011 SCC 47, written up here for Inforrm by Paul Schabas and Jon Goheen, has been hailed as a victory for free speech online. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
The factual and legal basis of this discussion comes from the Louisiana Supreme Court case McGlothlin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Given our visibility, we know they're serious people, bent on destruction. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:24 am
Pa. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:54 pm
The critical issue of preemption should be decided by officials elected by the people, with whom the responsibility for the health of the public resides. [read post]
