Search for: "People v George Williams" Results 381 - 400 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Friday, October 25, 20139:00 |  Opening RemarksPeter Hoffer (Distinguished Research Professor, University of Georgia)9:15-10:30  | Panel OneStephen Berry (University of Georgia), chairPaul Finkelman (President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law, Albany Law School) "John A. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:13 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
por Silvia Álvarez Curbelo Ph.D. publicado en la Academia Puertorriqueña de Jurisprudencia y Legislación “Creemos que la Cámara de Delegados, compuesta por los únicos genuinos representantes del pueblo de Puerto Rico, debe reunirse a lo menos una vez cada año, para vigilar los intereses de su pueblo, concurrir a la formación de su propuesto, proveer a las necesidades públicas y elevar al Congreso la perseverante demanda del derecho… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:46 am by David Kemp
After assessing the legislative history of the Sixth Amendment and the purpose of the jury, the Court in Williams v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
  That challenge is front and center in Mehanna v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Only the first third of the book deals with Lincoln’s actions, and even then, much of the constitutional analysis applies to the writings of Lincoln’s contemporaries like Horace Binney, William Whiting, and Sidney George Fisher. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
” During the Prop 8 trial, historian George Chauncey was shown some Prop 8 campaign ads. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
  The justices might readily concede the relevance of, say, William Treanor’s writings on the Takings Clause (e.g., here) or a study of Pumpelly v. [read post]