Search for: "People v I. S."
Results 381 - 400
of 39,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 2:21 pm
I mean, sure, we want to stop crazy homeless people from going into houses that aren't *actually* theirs and drinking juice boxes and the like. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:37 pm
I know, I know, I know. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:00 pm
I suspect that it's pure coincidence, but this opinion is appropriately published on 4/20.It's a story from back in 2016. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 3:36 pm
So the guy's fairly clearly driving drunk when he hits and kills someone. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:38 pm
(Full disclosure: I am lead counsel in one of the cases, State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:33 pm
"I agree with Justice Yegan that there's such a thing as "sidetracking" and that, when it happens, it's a problem. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:33 pm
But it happens.Here's the part I don't understand. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
But it's over the dissent of Justice Haerle. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:05 pm
A "solution" that works, I guess, if you think (1) there's very little COVID transmission in jails, and (2) the people to be institutionalized will simply get better on their own. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:16 pm
Yeah, I know, it's technically burglary. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Its legal position is also strong, but it intersects interestingly with two highly controversial SCOTUS cases.In today's essay, I'll compare and contrast Disney's First Amendment claims with Trump v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
I love the California Court of Appeal.Four weeks ago, I posted a lengthy critique of Justice Rylaarsdam's opinion that held that appointed counsel should not file Anders/Wende briefs raising "arguable but unmeritorious issues". [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
I really do. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:12 am
There's no way you can meet an actual woman on those things. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:55 am
I found this, in People, from last August:Biden has seven grandchildren by way of his four kids. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 9:13 am
But I'd have also said it's not very wise at the time. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
Maybe it's even worse than I thought. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
” I previously blogged about US v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In People v. iMergent, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 20, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) upheld a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from violating the UCL and the Seller Assisted Marketing Plan ("SAMP") Act (Civ. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Thanks for the head's up.Seriously, though, I really did like that introduction. [read post]
