Search for: "People v Irish"
Results 381 - 400
of 594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
The Belfast Telegraph notes that among the witnesses to be called is the Irish Press Ombudsman. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am
They’re still miffed about women suffrage, the Civil Rights bill and Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
The cases decided to date are People (DPP) v Cunningham [2012] IECCA 64, People (DPP) v Kavanagh [2012] IECCA 65, and People (DPP) v Barry O’Brien [2012] IECCA 68, and in each case the Court of Criminal Appeal has overturned the original conviction and ordered retrials. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am
Sibelius), some achieve moment (Miranda v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v… [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 7:56 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
Hot on the heels of McKillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Limited [2012] EWHC 1158 (Ch) (26 April 2012), about which I blogged in my previous post, the ever-wonderful Stare Decisis Hibernia blog draws attention to a 2010 open justice case in the Irish High Court. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:31 am
The first is the influence of the Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:08 am
Brother Ezor’s discussion of the judicial misunderstanding of technology in the People v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:30 am
Of course, the Video Privacy Protection Act has something… http://t.co/R0ZkBtv0 # SEC and CFTC Propose Identity Theft Red Flags Rules – May 7, 2012 marks the end of the comment period for the propos… http://t.co/xZJdFUE1 # EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding Addresses European Data Protection Authorities at Spring Conference http://t.co/Ql9tWYvR # Four Irish, British suspects helped Stratfor hack: U.S. http://t.co/wAhNcUtC # Good On You, Hulu. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:53 am
” This both openly advocates the treaty, while insinuating that imbalanced budgets were somehow the cause of the Irish recession. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:28 pm
In Nichols v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
The nineteenth-century Irish and German immigrants left their homelands to come to America, but according to Timothy Matovina “the first large group of Hispanic Catholics became part of the nation during that same era without ever leaving home, as they were incorporated into its boundaries during U.S. territorial expansion into Florida and then westward. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:10 pm
Abood v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
’ As his Supreme Court audition, Lord Reed could not have asked for better than Axa General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46, the first challenge to the Scottish Parliament’s legislative competence to reach the Court since it succeeded the JCPC as devolution’s final arbiter. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
In a separate libel claim, the football agent Paolo Vernazza and his ex-wife Sapphira, are suing the People newspaper over a story about Cole and her former husband, Ashley Cole, in a defamation and privacy claim. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]
