Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The appeal was considered by Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
”) Lord Kerr, like Stephens J at first instance, noted that that was not an immutable requirement as the ECtHR had stated in Mocanu v Romania (10865/09) (2015) 60 EHRR 19 (Paras 107-108 of Lord Kerr’s judgment) and as the Supreme Court had found in McCaughey’s case (See paras 118, 119 and, in particular, 139 of McCaughey’s case). [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
This is where most people are going 'Holy sh*t'. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm
Close scrutiny of any proposed social media duty of care from a rule of law perspective can help ensure that we make good law for bad people rather than bad law for good people. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
It compounds, rather than cures, the vice.Close scrutiny of any proposed social media duty of care from a rule of law perspective can help ensure that we make good law for bad people rather than bad law for good people. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
Do recent changes to Schedule 7 powers make Beghal v United Kingdom moot? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
My own view is that both the Lemon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v Turkey… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
John Reed Stark As cybersecurity has become an increasingly important consideration for all corporate operations, one of the most pernicious problems has been the rise of so-called “ransomware” attacks – that is, systems breaches in which hackers take control of corporate networks and demand ransom payments as a condition of unlocking the systems. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 12:33 am
Summary This case relates to a point of statutory construction in the Representation of the People Act 1983, s 90C(1)(a). [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Several of the majority decisions in Stott endorsed Lord Walker’s analysis in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 2 All ER 556 that the characteristics which fell within ECHR, art 14 were like a series of concentric circles: with the most personal innate characteristics being at the centre and requiring a high level of justification for differential treatment, and acquired characteristics (which are more concerned with what… [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
In 2018, we had a series of posts on the Government’s cancellation of Part 2 of the Leveson Inquiry. the failed attempt by the House of Lords to reintroduce the inquiry in the Data Protection Bill and the unsuccessful application for judicial review of the cancellation decision. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
The Claim form and Particulars of Claim are available on Lawtel [£] On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker,. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
Rule 27.9 requires a recording to be made of a hearing in open court of proceedings pending in the High Court, and in other proceedings at the Lord Chancellor’s direction. [read post]
