Search for: "People v Powell"
Results 381 - 400
of 638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:49 am
Powell, Jr. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
The Memorandum, and Justice Powell’s subsequent majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
In Payne v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
The respondent’s name in the first case nicely captures most people’s instinctive reaction upon discussing AEDPA: Ryan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
Powel (K.B. 1682) ("Thou canst not read a declaration. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 4:43 am
As reported by my colleague Michael Powell, even the word “women” has become verboten. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
Powell, 94 Fla. 550, 556, 114 So. 375, 378 (1927) (holding that, where a contract for legal services fails to expressly provide for the amount of the fee, a “reasonable” fee is implied); McGill v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
” –Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, to his biographer in 1991. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:58 am
That is good news for people who were worried that all affirmative action policies were now in danger following Justice O'Connor's retirement. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
Under Powell v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Having weak links in the ranks is a bad idea, and washing people out is necessary. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
But if Maine v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
White people, mostly | My new story for Medium looks at big foundations that have yet to share power with people of color.Nonprofit Quarterly: “Only by disrupting existing negative patterns and replacing them with positive ones can we hope to achieve the anti-racist systems change…” https://bit.ly/3m9vP7R #nonprofit #blackleaders #nonprofitleadersForbes: 28,000 Charities Had Tax-Exempt Status Revoked After Trump Administration ‘Error,’ Lawmakers… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
The four Citizens United v. [read post]
