Search for: "People v Word" Results 381 - 400 of 17,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Colorado’s stated objectives are, instead, entirely about (in then-Judge Gorsuch’s words) the preservation of the integrity and “practical functioning” of the Colorado primary election process. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
It's a domestic violence case, so people might well have strong opinions at the outset. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
It’s condescending to suggest that ordinary people were incapable of understanding that Mr Fox was engaging in word play” This was extensively discussed in the Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Each day there are fewer words, And more ellipses. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Governing people to people relations is a very different thing from state undermining personhood by criminalizing dancing. [read post]
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]