Search for: "People v. Brooks"
Results 381 - 400
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Lewitton v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 9:05 pm
In a recent Brookings Institution article, Mark MacCarthy, a nonresident senior fellow at the Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, argued that current copyright law is insufficient to address the challenges that advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology pose to the future of creative work. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Brooks, No. 05-4602, 05-4603, 05-4604, 05-4605, 05-4616 In a drug related prosecution, judgment is vacated and remanded in part where the court erred in declining a request that it give instructions requiring the jury to make an essential threshold determination of drug quantity and establish the penalty range for each individual conspiracy defendant, which resulted in a defendant receiving a sentence in excess of the maximum established by section 841(b)(1)(c). [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 4:56 am
Bostock v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Brooks (Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Nine year delay does not trigger laches but does preclude award of prejudgment interest: Humanscale Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Helen… [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Chapin, 299 AD2d 294; Kent v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Brooks, 479 So.2d 1169, 1180 (Ala. 1985) (subsequently adopted private electrical safety code inadmissible); Benford v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:29 am
NorAm Drilling Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
This case may be related to another DME health care fraud case, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
It made the richest people in the world central — almost too central — figures in our lives. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Cooper and Juliette V. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:52 pm
Regardless of the outcome of the trial, it could set off a flurry of appeals that could ultimately land the case before the Supreme Court, where multiple justices have called for a reexamination of New York Times v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
