Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 381 - 400 of 14,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday heard oral arguments (audio of arguments) in Bostic v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
  After hearing numerous pro se filings the district court eventually appointed defense counsel (Kauai attorney Dan Hempey) who filed a motion to dismiss based on the defense of privilege under the Article 12, section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution, State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Luke Rioux
The District Court dismissed the suit and The Supreme Court affirmed. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 pm by Donna Eng
July 27, 2011), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted a petition for writ of habeas corpus based upon a finding that the statute under which Shelton was convicted, Florida section 893.13, is unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Attorney General of the Cherokee Nation has filed suit not in state court but in the tribal district court of the Cherokee Nation. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:30 am by Paul Swedlund
He is lead counsel on an amicus brief for 45 states and the District of Columbia in support of Washington and Colorado in Chiafalo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
  Although most people believe the right was already there, it really was not according to many lower court cases over the years because of the reference to the militia:  A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.The Supreme Court finally answered the question, in a 5-4 decision in District of Columbia… [read post]