Search for: "People v. English" Results 381 - 400 of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It also reflects the growing influence of Strasbourg jurisprudence on English defamation law. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 am
This is important not just because it was projected outward (via the official English translation) to foreigners who may engage with Chinese law across chains of global production, but also because of its topic--blockchain. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am by CMS
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
It’s a modified hold-over from English law, where the governing principle was simply “The king can do no wrong. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
" A week and a half ago this weblog posted Matt Fisher's comment on Nokia v IPCom which was subtitled "Round Two of the English Leg of the International Patent Battle". [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:30 pm
In his class I first learned the case of Marbury v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:18 am by Donald Dinnie
  The insurer relied on a 1995 judgment of Mahli v Abbey Life Insurance [1995] 4 Re LR 305 as authority for the legal proposition that something cannot be said to be known to an underwriter if that something requires the aggregate of multiple facts known by different people within the insurance organisation. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm by Matt Flyntz
  For example, you can see the development of “American English” (and its deviation from “British English”) by plugging in the words “color” and “colour. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]