Search for: "People v. Floyd"
Results 381 - 400
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
As explained in the court's opinion in Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Speaking of individuals, I must admit some despair when I see Floyd Abrams argue on behalf of amicus curiae, Senator Mitch McConnell in Citizens United, especially when Abrams seeks to rely New York Times v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:40 am
In recognition of the extraordinary circumstances, the Supreme Court has agreed to release the audio from the Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
Scott, 116 F.3d 137, 140 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1997); Floyd v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Kitson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:25 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
The case in question is Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Ltd [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Floyd.Right: till Floyd J gave his judgment, Amersham for most people was just a sleepy town in BuckinghamshireHaving established that the invention they made was worth £50 million to Amersham International (subsequently taken over by GE), the judge held that Kelly was entitled to £1 million, and Chiu to £500,000, for the value of the inventive… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
" Illinois: People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
Source:New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 11, 2009. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:13 am
See: United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:56 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Douglas Floyd, THREE FACES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AFTER THE DEMISE OF UNITED MINE WORKERS v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Illinois: People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
And now, following the Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
And now, following the Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
