Search for: "People v. Graves" Results 381 - 400 of 1,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Instead, it may be facts or evidence from which reasonable inferences may be drawn, beyond the mere proximity of two people themselves. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I have defended detainees at the base since shortly after they arrived and was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 5:52 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Most people don’t consider cars to be “tools,” but they were established as such by the Florida Supreme Court in the 1920 decision of Southern Cotton Oil v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
And all of this is simply a precursor to the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The early judicial opinion in Cooke and Anr v MGN Ltd and Anr [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) suggests that in cases involving grave imputations serious harm will be so obvious that the need for evidence can be dispensed with, such as where an individual was wrongly accused of being ‘a terrorist or a paedophile’ in a national newspaper (Mr. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
” Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi warned that the ruling “threatens to strike a grave blow to one of the most fundamental Constitutional roles of the Congress: to conduct oversight on behalf of the American people. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:26 am by Amy Howe
” “It’s time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:55 am by Aziza Ahmed
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Raul "Pete" Pedrozo
The act also specifies that the U.S. decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China was made with “the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means” and that any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means would be viewed with grave concern by the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]