Search for: "People v. Holmes" Results 381 - 400 of 760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote in the 1892 case of McAuliffe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote in the 1892 case of McAuliffe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm by Giles Peaker
Straightforwardly unlawful. b. is, I presume, based upon a misapprehension of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 [our report]. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
As Justice Holmes stated in Crowley v Pulsifer (137 Mass 392 [1884]): It is desirable that the trial of cases should take place under public eye, not because the controversies of one citizen are of public concern, but because it is of the highest moment that those who administer [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:22 am by Ken White
Courts drag up Holmes' old "crowded theater" chestnut, often a favorite for people who want to suppress speech but can't think of a specific reason, completely ignoring its context. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
 We have a list of people who have attended the previous event, back in 2012, but it's now somewhat out-of-date: promotions, career moves and maternity leave being the main culprits. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am by Amy Howe
  In The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at a concurring opinion in the Tenth Circuit, in which Judge Jerome Holmes indicated that “animus toward gay people had played no role in the ban” that the court of appeals was striking down; that statement, Liptak suggests, “may foreshadow a problem for gay rights advocates at the Supreme Court. [read post]