Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 381 - 400
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 4:32 pm
” What about Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 6:18 am
Back in April, in Jones v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
The first is one I noted in my earlier post; the judicial guess that people don’t know how cell phones work strikes me as very dubious. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
In Musacchio v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:35 pm
The jury instructions in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Lord Wilson gave the leading judgment; Lord Kerr, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed with him. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Orin Kerr offers his take on why the plaintiffs in Frank v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:05 am
(Orin Kerr) I recently finished the new book by the late Bill Stuntz, The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Kerr: You’re up. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
One of the hallmarks of totalitarian regimes is their insistence on controlling people’s thoughts as well as their behaviour. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
And in this useful summary of the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
Maryland.Orin Kerr asks why the court spends so much time talking about judicial review in the middle of the opinion. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:45 pm
To make sure your business is not at risk for violating the law, talk to the knowledgeable Tennessee employment discrimination attorneys at Mays & Kerr. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 3:25 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 7:08 am
In People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
I suspect that Kerr is one of those people who believes that every word of a Supreme Court opinion is imbued with special powers, chosen for its precise and consequential meaning. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
Whether that remains the law is open right now, thanks to the recent grant in Carpenter v. [read post]
