Search for: "People v. Lloyd" Results 381 - 400 of 445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 6:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court, on June 11, 2010, issued an opinion in the case, State Farm Lloyds and Erin Strachan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions After a number of hearings going back to February 2008, Simpson J in New South Wales gave a 743 paragraph judgment in the case Michael Megna & Russell Lloyd v David Marshall & Richard Tory [2010] NSWSC 686. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Reduces costs—these are people for whom design cost is low. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am by INFORRM
  The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Lloyd also talks of the need to redact from the jury's view any charges that were entered nolle prosequi, and cites Byrd v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Lloyd also talks of the need to redact from the jury's view any charges that were entered nolle prosequi, and cites Byrd v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Lloyd Cutler, White House Counsel to Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, has written in the "Washington Post" that Senate Rule Twenty-Two is plainly unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]