Search for: "People v. London" Results 381 - 400 of 1,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
 The panel then discussed whether five years is too long a time to allow people to claim broad monopolies without any actual use. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
“Mainly because it’s forcing people to go through these types of motions for really no purpose whatsoever. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
Heaven help us if the route to the Supreme Court in London, and even recourse to Europe, were blocked or made more difficult. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm by Anna Gelpern
In 1986, the Delaware Chancery Court said in Katz v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Nathan Dorn
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
 In times of plenty, people avoid going to court and spend their time making money through commercial exploitation. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
She then returned to Glasgow, fearing she would have to self-isolate in a London hotel room for two weeks. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
Julia Hörnle, Professor of Internet Law, CCLS, Queen Mary University of London[1] It is now well known that internet users are widely tracked and profiled by a range of actors and the advancements in data science mean that such tracking and profiling is increasingly commercially profitable[2]. [read post]