Search for: "People v. Mays (1998)" Results 381 - 400 of 1,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Since the established practice was followed, there was no question of any illegality or unconstitutionality.The decision in AK Subbaiah v Karnataka Legislature Secretariat may also be noted. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:14 am
Federal Express Corp., 166 F.3d 1213 (6th Cir. 1998) (unpublished); Whitman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm by admin
Anderson died in May 1998 in a Compton car wash shootout. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
`[Y]ou may also wish to be introduced to a few of the many people that have taken advantage of our services and are now living a tax-free lifestyle. . . . [read post]