Search for: "People v. More"
Results 381 - 400
of 43,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2013, 12:17 pm
Or you dealt with more substantive offenses. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:26 pm
Which turns out was four years on the first count mentioned in the opinion, but 15 to life and 7 to life on two of the other counts.Which is more in line with what I'd have expected after reading the facts. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 12:52 pm
Why David Virgo decided to "shoot his way out" -- or, more accurately, fire shots indiscriminately into the woods -- and then give up is beyond me.Apart from the fact that he's probably seen too many movies. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
And does.Except Red never got caught and busted for seven extra years.More proof that crime in the movies is a lot more fun than crime in real life. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
Three years ago, when the Court of Appeal struck down Section 1814 of the Insurance Code, which prohibits bail companies from paying inmates from referring potential customers, as an unconstitutional infringement of free speech, I was skeptical, saying (among other things):Letting bail agents make "arrangements" with inmates to refer clients to 'em clearly, in my view, distorts the marketplace, and punishing such conduct will lead to a marketplace more closely (albeit… [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:33 am
Sometimes, in the middle of an opinion, you read a paragraph that just makes everything else make sense.So when Justice Nicholson says, in the context of whether it was proper to conduct a joint trial of both of defendant's alleged crimes:"Second, neither case was more prejudicial than the other or unusually likely to inflame the jury. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:28 pm
"Defendant] was caught transporting (among other drugs) more than 3,600 doses of methamphetamine with a street value between $111,000 and $222,000. . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 1:17 pm
Between August and October 2015, Jane obtained three restraining orders against defendant, and despite these orders, Jane and defendant reunited and broke up several more times between December 2015 and April 18, 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:03 am
I achieved another big win for a client in Queens! [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
Here, the patent-in-suit is still going to be a valid for a few more months, and Daimler made a counteroffer well ahead of the trial, which used to be deemed more than timely in Germany.What the CJEU meant in Huawei v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:05 pm
Remember Marbury v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 4:11 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
From Stavig v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 4:27 am
People v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:09 am
The post Child Support Bullets Part 13: Family v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:25 pm
Of course, you can also use the Comment feature to let people know what you think about the possible application of this federal preemption legal doctrine to drug injury lawsuits -- the issue that is before our Supreme Court in the Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" initial people in the opinion. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
"So they get warrants, find flash drives and the like, find more kiddie porn, etc. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
More struggles ensure on the ground, Mr. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
