Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 381 - 400 of 13,546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
" Franck commended the justices for exercising great integrity in putting politics and popularity aside when they overruled Roe v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
WIPIP session 6: IP Theory
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Graham v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection that Enforcing Section Three is "Undemocratic"
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
WIPIP session 5: Anti-Circumvention
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter, 3 February 2024
3 Feb 2024, 4:51 am by INFORRM
Plaintiff X v. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
President Biden is Telling the Truth About Taxes, so Why Is a Fact-Checker Calling him a Liar?
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Some Small Progress on an Element of Truth in re Robert Card.
2 Feb 2024, 7:23 am by Ed Folsom, Retired Maine Criminal Defense Attorney
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]
Edmund R. Folsom Law Blog - http://edfolsomlaw.com/the-law-blog
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The U.S. Capitol Police Makes It Official: Congress is Legally Obscene
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
 United States v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
Book review: Research Handbook on International Abortion Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023)
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
In particular, it discusses the weaknesses of Roe v. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am by jonathanturley
Hunter v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
The Biden Administration Must Use Civil Rights Enforcement to Push Back Against Texas’s Racist Invocation of Invasion
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Kate Huddleston
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
New Method, Same Old Problems
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
[Eugene Volokh] Antifa-vs.-Patriot-Prayer-Related Tort Lawsuit Partly Thrown Out but Partly Allowed to Go Forward
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
But, as explained in Counterman v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Lenity and Agency Deference in Garland v. Cargill, by Tess Saperstein
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
 Garland v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Strategic Litigation Takes the International Stage: South Africa v Israel in Its Broader Context
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
In the wake of last week’s pathbreaking International Court of Justice order of provisional measures concerning alleged genocide in Gaza, much reaction has rightly addressed the ramifications for international diplomacy, Israel, South Africa, the United States and the Palestinian people. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
The Supreme Court and the Future of Commercial Regulation by the Administrative State
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
People talk of Chevron deference as though it were binary (deference or no deference), but in practice it is not so monolithic. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
Case Comment: Blake v Fox, It all comes down to serious harm – Hayley Webster
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
  On 1 October 2020, Laurence Fox (actor and political figure) responded to a tweet by Sainsburys which celebrated Black History Month. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/