Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)" Results 381 - 400 of 1,867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2008, 6:30 pm
Southern California Gas Co., Los Angeles Superior Court No. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
Reyna, 92 Idaho 669, 448 P.2d 762, 767 (1968); see also People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 10:22 am
The article notes that 11 appellate and 45 superior court vacancies remain, and that appellate justices earn $228,918 per year, and superior court judges $200,402.And see/hear Save the Oral Argument! [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:15 am by Terry Hart
A good background of the issues is provided, as well as some thoughts on how likely the Court is to agree to hear the case. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 5:38 pm
The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) Court Schedule Court Summary, Week Ending 8 September 2006 Case Resources: The Civil Defence Forces (CDF) Accused The Revolutionary United Front (RUF) Accused The Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (ARFC) Accused Prosecutor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am by Bob Ambrogi
Farwell In this Massachusetts Superior Court case, plaintiff’s counsel filed four memoranda in response to four separate motions to dismiss. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The U.S. stands virtually alone, among constitutional democracies with well-established judicial review by independent courts, in providing neither for a retirement age nor for a limited term in office for its high court justices. [read post]