Search for: "People v. Sweet"
Results 381 - 400
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
The architecture is rich and varied, the people are warm and friendly. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 11:31 am
My sweet husband 34. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Select papers featured in the book address subjects such as unconscionability in clauses used to access adjudicative procedures for disputes; the recent destabilization of the law of unjust enrichment by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v Sweet, 2018 SCC 52; and how adverse possession both undermines property law and illuminates its social and communal nature. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Herbai wrote the second article, “Sweet 16%”. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Meanwhile, the July 2010 issue of the Sweet & Maxwell monthly European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) is also out, with a really important article by Christian Koenig and Ana Trias on the harmonisation of standard-setting procedures within and between the US and the EU. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:50 am
v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The only people to have colleges named after them in both Oxford and Cambridge are Jesus, St John, Wolfson ... and CATS! [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am
(L 199) 40 (EC) [4] Giuliano & Lagarde Report, sec. 4. [5] Ibid. [6] See Chapter I & Chapter II. [7] Report, sec. 4. [8] Ibid. [9] See Chapter I. [10] See Chapter I & Chapter III. [11] See Chapters V-VII. [12] See Chapter VIII. [13] Lawrence Collins (ed) Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws (15th edn Sweet & Maxwell 2012) 2077. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
” FCC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
That would've been sweet. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
What you do is you go to Trumptaxreformtalk.eventbrite, which is E‑V‑E‑N‑T‑B‑R‑I‑T‑E, .com. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
As a matter of law, from the plaintiff’s perspective patent infringement claims are a sweet deal (assuming your claims aren’t totally meritless, in which case the sanctions can be quite severe). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
” Agency for Health Care Admin. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Purely personal opinion and bias were the key drivers of argument, but neither party was especially in tune with or supportive of the opinions of the other; a case of Paul Simon’s “people talking without speaking, people hearing without listening”. [read post]
