Search for: "People v. Sweet" Results 381 - 400 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Meanwhile, the July 2010 issue of the Sweet & Maxwell monthly European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) is also out, with a really important article by Christian Koenig and Ana Trias on the harmonisation of standard-setting procedures within and between the US and the EU. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In terms of enforcement action, 2009 actions 44% of the enforcement letters were internet-related; 1/3rd of 2010 letters are internet-related. 14 letters issued over sponsored link issues in 2009, making a spike v. other years. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:53 am by SHG
  The sweet talk of Johnston v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  People increasingly demand food in its natural form to nourish their bodies down to the cellular level. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:11 pm
Right: an unusual defence strategy, but it might just work ...The May 2010 issue of the European Trade Mark Reports (ETMR), published monthly by Sweet & Maxwell, contains some choice cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
You can read it for yourself here.The IPKat's friend Colin Birss QC has drawn his attention to a landmark ruling in an American case about patenting genes: AMP v USPTO 09 Civ 4515 (DJ Sweet). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]