Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 381 - 400 of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Asmar the prosecution sought permission to adduce evidence about the defendant’s past with the complainant. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 6:43 am by Simon Lester
Over on Twitter, lots of people are talking about the recent investment arbitration award in Eco Oro Minerals v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 7:52 am
Rather than rely on lazy, oversimplified, ideological labeling -- the "conservative" and "pro-business" Roberts Court took a surprising detour into pro-plaintiff, liberal territory in last week's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 5:40 pm
Earlier today, the state Supreme Court took a closer look at 265 cases to see whether they were affected by Cunningham v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
Note that it took a combination of very specific facts and a sympathetic judge relying on very old law just to get past a motion to dismiss. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
The newspaper account is incorrect and took his remarks out of context. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
Further, the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony establishing that defendant had been incarcerated since his arrest (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932, 933), as well as testimony on direct examination of the confidential informant that defendant had not made certain exculpatory statements to him while they were in jail following defendant's arrest (see generally People v Collins, 12 AD3d 33, 38-39).It cannot be said that County Court "took… [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People as was established in People v. [read post]