Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 381 - 400 of 30,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
 (Which I remember well, as I was 10 at the time. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:04 pm
I knew that prisons see a fair (or at least surprising) amount of drug trafficking, as well as trafficking in cell phones, cigarettes, etc. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:04 am
 And the weapon in this case was indeed hidden reasonably well:  right underneath the lip of the locker, with a magnet to attach it. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:34 am
The month of November did not start out well for Howard K. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
 It's for the judiciary to say whether "arguable but unmeritorious" issues should be raised, as well as to interpret what we exactly mean by that.And that's exactly what the California Supreme Court should do. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
  That's how the opinion reads, as well as a press release from the DA's office at the time. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
 Or, worse, what the jury instructions in such cases should say.Witness this opinion.The majority and the dissent disagree about both what to do in situations like this one as well as what exactly transpired here. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:25 pm
 A serious crime as well, but less serious.The key difference between these two things is "force or fear". [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:54 pm
Appellants thus miss the point that they have the duty on appeal to state the evidence fairly, in the light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, and record citations are for the benefit of the reviewing court as well as the respondent. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
That voting to acquit might well not be the best possible move she could make if she wanted to be hired for the job to which she applied literally hours previously? [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
  And making the case final now only necessitates that we pay for either appointed counsel to write a petition for review (if the government wins) or pay the Attorney General to write one (if the defendant wins) -- both of which we know full well will be held pending the outcome of the California Supreme Court's decision.Given all the wasted effort, I might just prefer that we hold the case for now, and then quickly and efficiently dispense with the thing once the Calfornia… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:45 pm
  According to the Court of Appeal:  a distinction without a difference.)Well done, 62-year old victim Dennis N. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
 But here, the trial court lets defendant plead guilty to a misdemeanor -- although the prosecution, which had filed felony charges, opposes such relief -- because if he pleads guilty to a felony, under his contract with Subway, he may well lose his Subway stores.God forbid we should deprive you of the instrumentality of your crimes, eh? [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 1:25 pm
  Why not disseminate this vital information here as well:"[T]he manufacture of methamphetamine requires five steps. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
 The Court of Appeal demonstrates its cultural awareness as well:"Defendants . . . . contend the measure summary and impartial analysis that appeared in the ballot pamphlet materials for Proposition D described the ordinance as authorizing delivery of medical marijuana by vehicles and they maintain that the voters enacting the proposition adopted that construction. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
  As well as an ironic one.Defendant files the appeal to get out of a $300 restitution fine, claiming he has no ability to pay. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:22 pm
  The court additionally dismissed the defendants argument that an exception for using the debris as fill material was met - stating that the fill material exception was negated when the debris reached a height (70 feet) well above the adjacent land as the exception stated. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:21 pm
Ellis — last week’s Georgia Supreme Court decision that held that Georgia’s “stalking” law doesn’t restrict harsh public speech about people — and to participate in oral argument as well. [read post]