Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 381 - 400 of 123,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
The defendants refused, relying inter alia on the ‘personal data of others’ exemption (see DB v General Medical Council), in light of the claimant’s conduct. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
§ 112(a))Enablement was considered by the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, with respect to an antibody genus claim. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Food and Drug Administration overstepped its authority by expanding access to the abortion pill mifepristone, such as by allowing the drug to be dispensed without in-person clinical visits.Access to mifepristone has become particularly important after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
She argues that Section 230 does not apply because her claims are based on Meta connecting her to a certain person, not directing her to certain content. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]