Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 13,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
Additionally, in a Subchapter V case, the business is not required to pay quarterly fees to the United States Trustee. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:42 pm by Steven Calabresi
  I therefore urged the Court to deny his petition, which it did.The post The Supreme Court Denies Cert. in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
This parallels developments in other common law jurisdictions such as the United States, England and Australia where guidance for lawyers on the ethical use of generative AI is starting to emerge. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:13 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
I write to urge you to take appropriate steps to ensure that Justice Clarence Thomas recuses himself from consideration of the petition for certiorari and any future proceedings in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
United States, could affect the charges against Trump even if the justices ultimately rule that he is not immune from prosecution, it too could delay the March 4 trial date. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by David Lynn
In a separate judgment, the Court stated (footnotes omitted): This cause was considered on the petition of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Longview Chamber of Commerce, Texas Association of Business, for review of an order of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and was argued by counsel. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]